1. Definition

  • Compromise Power Analysis is a method for determining an appropriate balance between:
    • Type I error (α) → false positives, and
    • Type II error (β) → false negatives,
      given a fixed sample size (n).

Instead of fixing α and power (1 – β) ahead of time (like in a priori analysis), you already know n and ask:

  • “Given my sample size, what α and β trade-off makes sense?”

2. Why It’s Useful

  • Sometimes you can’t change n (e.g., limited participants, budget, or historical dataset).
  • A priori analysis would tell you “you need 500 subjects” but you only have 200.
  • Compromise analysis answers: “With 200 subjects, what α and β should I set to have a balanced test?”

3. How It Works

  1. Define effect size (δ) of interest.
  2. Provide the available sample size (n).
  3. Set a desired ratio of Type I to Type II error rates (often 1:1).
    • Example: α = β, or α = 0.5β, etc.
  4. The analysis finds values of α and β that satisfy the constraint.

4. Example

Suppose:

  • Effect size = medium (Cohen’s d = 0.5).
  • Available n = 40 (20 per group).
  • Want α and β to be equal (α = β).

Compromise power analysis might yield:

  • α = 0.12
  • β = 0.12 (so power = 0.88)

Interpretation: Instead of forcing α = 0.05, you accept a higher Type I error rate (12%) to balance with Type II error, given your small sample.


5. Comparison with Other Analyses

FeatureA PrioriPost HocCompromise
InputEffect size, α, powerObserved n & effect sizeEffect size, available n, error ratio
OutputRequired nAchieved powerAppropriate α & β
UsePlanning sample sizeExplaining sensitivity after studyBalancing errors when n is fixed

6. Limitations

  • Less commonly reported in papers (journals prefer α = 0.05 convention).
  • May be harder to justify to non-technical audiences.
  • Still depends on assumed effect size (which might be uncertain).

7. Key Takeaway

  • A priori: “How many subjects do I need?”
  • Post hoc: “Given what I saw, what was the power?”
  • Compromise: “I only have this many subjects — how should I balance α and β?”

In short:
Compromise power analysis is used when your sample size is fixed, and you want to find a reasonable balance between Type I and Type II error rates instead of strictly fixing α at 0.05. It’s a pragmatic approach when data collection is limited.