1. Overview

The normal distribution is fundamental to statistical modeling.
Due to the Central Limit Theorem, many real-world data-generating processes can be approximated by a normal likelihood, even if the underlying process is not exactly normal.

When the variance (σ²) is known, we can derive analytical Bayesian results for the mean parameter θ, starting with one observation and then generalizing to multiple data points.


2. Likelihood for One Data Point

Let $y$ be a single scalar observation drawn from a normal distribution:

$p(y \mid θ) = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi σ^2}} \exp\left[-\frac{1}{2σ^2}(y – θ)^2\right]$

Here, $θ$ is the unknown mean and $σ^2$ is the known variance.


3. Conjugate Prior and Posterior

Because the likelihood is an exponential of a quadratic function in θ, the conjugate prior must also be normal.
We parameterize it as:

$p(θ) \propto \exp\left[-\frac{1}{2τ_0^2}(θ – μ_0)^2\right]$

which is:

$θ \sim N(μ_0, τ_0^2)$

where:

  • $μ_0$​: prior mean
  • $τ_0^2$​: prior variance (known hyperparameter)

Posterior Distribution

Given $y$, the posterior is also normal:

$p(θ \mid y) \propto \exp\left[-\frac{1}{2}\left(\frac{(y – θ)^2}{σ^2} + \frac{(θ – μ_0)^2}{τ_0^2}\right)\right]$

By expanding and completing the square, we find:

$p(θ \mid y) \propto \exp\left[-\frac{1}{2τ_1^2}(θ – μ_1)^2\right]$

Hence:

$θ \mid y \sim N(μ_1, τ_1^2)$

where

$\frac{1}{τ_1^2} = \frac{1}{τ_0^2} + \frac{1}{σ^2}$

and

$μ_1 = \frac{\frac{μ_0}{τ_0^2} + \frac{y}{σ^2}}{\frac{1}{τ_0^2} + \frac{1}{σ^2}}$


4. Interpretation: Posterior Precision and Mean

  • The precision (inverse variance) adds up linearly:

$\text{Posterior precision} = \text{Prior precision} + \text{Data precision}$

That is:

$\frac{1}{τ_1^2} = \frac{1}{τ_0^2} + \frac{1}{σ^2}$

  • The posterior mean $μ_1$​ is a weighted average of the prior mean and observed data:

$μ_1 = \frac{(1/τ_0^2) μ_0 + (1/σ^2) y}{(1/τ_0^2) + (1/σ^2)}$


Alternative Forms
  1. As prior adjusted toward the data:

$μ_1 = μ_0 + (y – μ_0) \frac{τ_0^2}{σ^2 + τ_0^2}$

  1. As data shrunk toward the prior:

$μ_1 = y – (y – μ_0) \frac{σ^2}{σ^2 + τ_0^2}$

Thus, the posterior mean lies between $μ_0$​ and $y$, representing a compromise between prior belief and observed evidence.


Limiting Cases
ConditionInterpretationPosterior Mean
$τ_0^2 = 0$Prior is infinitely precise$μ_1 = μ_0$
$σ^2 = 0$Data is perfectly precise$μ_1 = y$
$y = μ_0$Data equals prior mean$μ_1 = μ_0 = y$

5. Posterior Predictive Distribution

We now consider a future observation $\tilde{y}$​.
The posterior predictive distribution integrates over uncertainty in θ:

$p(\tilde{y} \mid y) = \int p(\tilde{y} \mid θ)p(θ \mid y)\, dθ$

Given $\tilde{y} \mid θ \sim N(θ, σ^2)$ and $θ \mid y \sim N(μ_1, τ_1^2)$, the result of this convolution is also normal:

$\tilde{y} \mid y \sim N(μ_1, σ^2 + τ_1^2)$

Hence:

$E(\tilde{y} \mid y) = μ_1, \quad \operatorname{Var}(\tilde{y} \mid y) = σ^2 + τ_1^2$

The variance combines:

  • $σ^2$: predictive variance (data uncertainty)
  • $τ_1^2$​: posterior uncertainty in θ

6. Extension to Multiple Observations

Now consider $y = (y_1, y_2, \ldots, y_n)$, where all $y_i$ are independent and identically distributed:

$y_i \mid θ \sim N(θ, σ^2)$

The joint likelihood is:

$p(y \mid θ) \propto \exp\left[-\frac{1}{2σ^2} \sum_{i=1}^n (y_i – θ)^2 \right]$

Combining with the prior $N(μ_0, τ_0^2)$, we obtain the posterior:

$θ \mid y \sim N(μ_n, τ_n^2)$

where

$\frac{1}{τ_n^2} = \frac{1}{τ_0^2} + \frac{n}{σ^2}$

and

$μ_n = \frac{\frac{μ_0}{τ_0^2} + \frac{n\bar{y}}{σ^2}}{\frac{1}{τ_0^2} + \frac{n}{σ^2}}$

with $\bar{y} = \frac{1}{n}\sum_{i=1}^n y_i$ being the sample mean.

Thus, $\bar{y}$​ is a sufficient statistic for θ in this model.


7. Sequential Updating

If data arrive one at a time, you can update sequentially:

  • Use the posterior after the first observation as the new prior for the next.
  • After n updates, the posterior is the same as the formula above.

8. Large Sample Approximation

If the prior is weakly informative (large $τ_0^2$​) or the data size n is large, the prior influence fades.
As $τ_0^2 \to \infty$ or $n \to \infty$:

$p(θ \mid y) \approx N\left(\bar{y}, \frac{σ^2}{n}\right)$

This is the sampling distribution of the sample mean, confirming that for large n, the Bayesian posterior coincides with the frequentist result.


Key Takeaways

ConceptFormula / ExpressionInterpretation
Likelihood$p(y \mid θ) = N(θ, σ^2)$Model for data
Prior$θ \sim N(μ_0, τ_0^2)$Belief before seeing data
Posterior$θ \mid y \sim N(μ_1, τ_1^2)$Updated belief
Posterior Mean$μ_1 = \frac{(1/τ_0^2) μ_0 + (1/σ^2) y}{(1/τ_0^2) + (1/σ^2)}$Weighted average of prior and data
Posterior Variance$\frac{1}{τ_1^2} = \frac{1}{τ_0^2} + \frac{1}{σ^2}$Additive in precision
Predictive Distribution$\tilde{y} \mid y \sim N(μ_1, σ^2 + τ_1^2)$Accounts for model + parameter uncertainty
Multiple Observations$θ \mid y \sim N(μ_n, τ_n^2)$Depends only on sample mean $\bar{y}$
Large n Approximation$θ \mid y \approx N(\bar{y}, σ^2/n)$Prior negligible when data dominate

Summary in words:
The normal model with known variance provides one of the simplest and most elegant examples of Bayesian inference.

  • The posterior remains normal due to conjugacy.
  • The posterior mean represents a balance between prior belief and observed data.
  • The posterior variance reflects combined uncertainty, decreasing as data accumulate.
  • The predictive distribution incorporates both data variability (σ²) and parameter uncertainty (τ₁²).
  • For large samples, the Bayesian posterior closely approximates the frequentist result $N(\bar{y}, σ^2/n)$.