Statistical Power
1. Core Definition
Statistical power is
the probability of correctly detecting a real effect when it truly exists.
- Formula: Power = 1 − β
- β (Type II error):
- The probability of failing to detect an effect that actually exists
Power measures detection ability, not correctness of conclusions.
2. The Full Hypothesis Testing Framework
| True State | Decision | Outcome |
|---|---|---|
| No effect (H0 true) | Reject H0 | Type I error (α) |
| No effect | Fail to reject H0 | Correct decision |
| Effect exists (H1 true) | Fail to reject H0 | Type II error (β) |
| Effect exists | Reject H0 | Power (1 − β) |
Power answers the question:
“If an effect is real, how likely am I to detect it?”
3. Intuition: Signal vs Noise
Key idea
Power is fundamentally a signal-to-noise problem.
- Signal: effect size
- Noise: standard error (variability / √n)
Roughly,
- Larger values → higher probability of exceeding the critical value → higher power
4. Power from a Distribution Perspective
Hypothesis testing always compares two distributions:
(1) Distribution under H0
- Effect = 0
- Test statistic centered near zero
(2) Distribution under H1
- Effect ≠ 0
- Distribution shifts away from zero
Power
= the area of the H1 distribution beyond the critical value.
5. Four Key Determinants of Power
① Effect Size
- Larger effect → higher power
- Common measures:
- Mean difference (Cohen’s d)
- Correlation (r)
- Explained variance (R²)
② Sample Size (n)
- Larger n → smaller standard error → higher power
- Standard error ∝ 1 / √n
③ Variability / Noise (σ)
- More variability → lower power
- Cleaner, more precise data improves detection
④ Significance Level (α)
- Higher α → higher power
- Trade-off: increased Type I error risk
6. Common Misconceptions
Misconception 1
“Power = 80% means the result is 80% correct.”
Reality:
- Power does not measure correctness
- It measures the ability to detect a real effect
Misconception 2
“A non-significant result means no effect.”
Reality:
- Non-significant means insufficient evidence
- The study may simply lack power
Misconception 3
“Bigger samples are always better.”
Reality:
- Large samples can make trivial effects statistically significant
- Statistical significance ≠ practical significance
7. Why Power Matters
1) Better understanding of p-values
- p-values describe outcomes
- power describes capability
2) Understanding study design
- Explains why sample size, measurement precision, and modeling choices matter
3) Reframing “failure”
- Failure to reject H0 does not imply a flawed study
- It may indicate insufficient detection power
8. Ways to Increase Power
| Method | Core Mechanism |
|---|---|
| Increase sample size | Reduce standard error |
| Improve measurement | Reduce noise |
| Add covariates | Reduce residual variance |
| Use repeated measures | Control individual differences |
| One-sided tests | Lower critical threshold |
| Increase α | Accept higher false-positive risk |
9. Conventional Benchmark
- Common target: Power = 0.80
- Meaning:
- If an effect truly exists, there is an 80% chance of detecting it
10. Key Takeaway Statements
- Power measures analytical capability
- Non-significant ≠ no effect
- Power matters both before and after analysis
- Statistics is about managing uncertainty, not guaranteeing truth
11. Concept Map
Effect size ↑
Sample size ↑ → Signal / Noise ↑ → Power ↑
Variance ↓
α ↑