Holdback Group
A randomized holdback can estimate a policy’s continuing effect when assignment, follow-up, treatment history, and the outcome window support the comparison.
A randomized holdback can estimate a policy’s continuing effect when assignment, follow-up, treatment history, and the outcome window support the comparison.
A direct answer to how likely it is that the treatment helped — and how much less comfortable that answer becomes once a threshold that matters is attached.
The change in conversion rate caused by a variant, on two scales that differ by a factor of the baseline. The relative figure needs its own interval formula.
When an experiment ends must be decided before the results are seen. The kinds of rule in use, which error rate each protects, and what looking early costs.
One look at the end calls B better 5.03% of the time on identical variants. Looking every twenty users: 27.96%.
A fixed-horizon A/B test needs a defined population, assignment, outcome, and stopping rule. Logging, dependence, and time variation affect interpretation.
The unobservable rate behind the number in the dashboard. What defines it, and why the textbook interval around it is not as safe as it looks.
Do two groups convert at the same rate? The pooled z statistic, a worked A/B example with its interval, when to use Fisher’s exact test, and the A/B pitfalls.
Testing several page elements in one experiment. What a factorial design buys, what it does not cost, and how the arm count multiplies the false positives.
Random assignment supports the plain treated-versus-control comparison; random ranking supplies an uplift baseline. Observational estimates need additional identification and adjustment assumptions.
Conversions divided by something. Which something decides what the metric means, how it moves, and whether its error bars are honest.
Looking at a running experiment repeatedly, legitimately. What naive peeking does to the error rate, and how planned boundaries hold it.
Randomization makes groups comparable in expectation. Estimate assignment effects with uncertainty and check departures from the intended design.
The conversions a campaign caused, as opposed to the ones it was merely present for. What the scaling to a full population quietly assumes.
Offline scores measure predictions on logged data. Deployment value also depends on exposure, action capacity, outcome value, and intervention effects.
An offline metric argues a model might help; an experiment is the evidence it did.