Active Learning
From a 10-label seed, uncertainty sampling reached 0.5714 and random sampling 0.6418 on the same budget. It only won once the seed reached 400 in this experiment.
From a 10-label seed, uncertainty sampling reached 0.5714 and random sampling 0.6418 on the same budget. It only won once the seed reached 400 in this experiment.
Leaving 80% of training positives unlabeled reduced recall from 0.6341 to 0.0031 in this experiment. Evaluation-label omissions have different effects.
Oracle source weights achieved 0.8088 accuracy at 93.7% coverage. Coverage also depends on how ties and abstentions are resolved.
Random label noise in training barely moved accuracy, 0.7732 to 0.7681. The same noise in the test set took it to 0.5595, and AUROC to 0.5743.