Multiple Comparisons
Slicing a metric until something stands out is a search procedure. Selected findings need error control that accounts for the search.
Slicing a metric until something stands out is a search procedure. Selected findings need error control that accounts for the search.
You choose a nominal significance level. Actual Type I error and power depend on the test, assumptions, sample size, and effect.
The significance level translated onto the statistic’s scale. How 1.645 and 1.96 arise, why two-sided tests use alpha over two, and the mistakes it invites.
Statistical significance says how incompatible the data are with a null model at a chosen threshold. It does not say how large or how important an effect is.
Do two groups convert at the same rate? The pooled z statistic, a worked A/B example with its interval, when to use Fisher’s exact test, and the A/B pitfalls.
Power is the probability of rejecting the null when a specific alternative is true. Effect size, sample size, α, and variability set it, and it changes with the test design.
A test rejects or fails to reject — it never confirms. And “fail to reject” covers both no effect and not enough data to tell.
A p-value is a probability about data given a model. Reading it as a probability about the hypothesis inverts the conditional.
Estimate minus null value, over a known standard error, against the normal curve. Exact for normal data with known sigma, else approximate; mostly proportions.
Estimate over its estimated standard error, referred to Student’s t. One-sample, paired, and two-sample forms, when to use Welch, and heavy tails.
“Unlikely due to chance” is the one reading a p-value cannot support. What it measures is incompatibility with a model, assumptions included.
A random forest scores 1.0000 in training on two samples drawn from the same distribution. Held out, it scores 0.4700.
Which test answers which question, from one-sample t to Fisher’s exact and Kolmogorov–Smirnov, how to choose by question, and the limits of a rejection.
A noninferiority test asks whether a new option is worse than the old one by no more than a margin chosen in advance, and it passes only when the confidence interval’s lower bound clears that margin.
Compare two systems on the same cases by counting where only one passes. The exact test and worked counts explain why pairing changes the evidence for a difference.